Donald Trump’s interruptions put him at risk of being expelled when E. Jean Carroll approaches him for the first time, accusing him of rape and lying.

As she testified in her defamation lawsuit against former US President Donald Trump on Wednesday morning, E Jean Carroll saw the former president in court for the first time.

Carroll filed a lawsuit against Trump, claiming that he had raped her in a department store dressing room almost thirty years prior, accusing him of lying and harming her reputation. Carroll’s evidence angered and defied Trump, who denied ever having met her. He repeatedly disrupted the proceedings and ran the possibility of being ejected from the courtroom.

“Donald Trump assaulted me, and when I wrote about it, he said it never happened,” Carroll testified to the jurors. His dishonesty destroyed my reputation.

This is a “con-job” case: Trump

As Carroll was speaking, Trump, who was seated at the back of the court with his main attorney, Alina Habba, leaned back in his chair and whispered to her. Shawn Crowley, Carroll’s attorney, claims that he also made audible remarks that the jury and the attorneys could hear.

During E Jean Carroll’s testimony, Mr. Trump was seated at the rear table and spoke loudly throughout the entirety of Ms. Carroll’s defamation trial. He had “mysterious red marks” on his hand. I assume the jury can hear it because it’s loud enough for us to hear it,” Crowley remarked.

Judge Lewis Kaplan issued a warning to Trump, telling him to keep quiet and not to meddle in the courtroom. To prevent the jury from overhearing, he added, “I’m just going to ask Mr. Trump to take special care to keep his voice down when conferring with counsel.”

Nevertheless, Trump disregarded the judge’s orders and carried on speaking throughout the trial.

Crowley informed the judge that Trump has referred to the case as a “con job” and a “witch-hunt.”

“I would love it.”

“Mr. Trump has the right to be present here,” Kaplan stated. That right may be revoked, and it may be revoked if he disobeys court orders and acts disruptively, as has been reported to me. I hope I don’t have to think about barring you from the trial, Mr. Trump. I am aware that you are probably anxious for me to complete that.

“I would love it, I would love it,” Trump stated while making a gesture.

“It seems like you lack self-control in this situation, even though I know you would,” Kaplan answered.

“Neither can you,” Trump retorted.

Following Carroll’s conclusion of her remarks, Roberta Kaplan, one of her attorneys, inquired about her background as a writer and columnist for Elle magazine. Carroll’s journey from writing for esteemed magazines to becoming a popular book and talk show host was revealed to the judges.

Trump v. Carroll: not a unique instance

Carroll is suing Trump for defamation for the second time. She was awarded $5 million against him in May after a jury declared him guilty of slander and sexual assault. In 2019, Carroll came forward with her accusation of rape against Trump in a passage taken from her book, What Do We Need Men For? New York magazine published A Modest Proposal.

“I’ve never met this person in my life,” retorted Trump, who was president at the time. Her motivation should be obvious given that she is attempting to promote a new book. It ought to be offered in the fiction area.

SOURCE: https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/donald-trump-says-he-would-love-it-after-judge-threatens-to-kick-him-out-of-e-jean-carroll-defamation-trial-101705539763683.html/